<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SSI Endorses 1984 SCIENCE Report Retraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semmelweis.org/2008/12/09/ssi-endorses-1984-science-report-retraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semmelweis.org/2008/12/09/ssi-endorses-1984-science-report-retraction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Documentary Angers Corrupt Scientists</title>
		<link>http://www.semmelweis.org/2008/12/09/ssi-endorses-1984-science-report-retraction/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Documentary Angers Corrupt Scientists</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semmelweis.org/?p=206#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>[...] who couldn’t resist the opportunity of having their egos stroked on the big screen with other scientific frauds. Unfortunately for them, no one memorized their alibis and the interviews of the planet’s most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who couldn’t resist the opportunity of having their egos stroked on the big screen with other scientific frauds. Unfortunately for them, no one memorized their alibis and the interviews of the planet’s most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: House of Numbers Upsets Corrupt Scientists at Semmelweis Society International</title>
		<link>http://www.semmelweis.org/2008/12/09/ssi-endorses-1984-science-report-retraction/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>House of Numbers Upsets Corrupt Scientists at Semmelweis Society International</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semmelweis.org/?p=206#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>[...] who couldn’t resist the opportunity of having their egos stroked on the big screen with other scientific frauds. Unfortunately for them, no one memorized their alibis and the interviews of the planet’s most [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who couldn’t resist the opportunity of having their egos stroked on the big screen with other scientific frauds. Unfortunately for them, no one memorized their alibis and the interviews of the planet’s most [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Has Sustiva Solved an HIV Mystery? at Semmelweis Society International</title>
		<link>http://www.semmelweis.org/2008/12/09/ssi-endorses-1984-science-report-retraction/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Has Sustiva Solved an HIV Mystery? at Semmelweis Society International</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semmelweis.org/?p=206#comment-707</guid>
		<description>[...] HIV/AIDS research is based upon Dr. Gallo’s unproven assumption that HIV attacks cells and causes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HIV/AIDS research is based upon Dr. Gallo’s unproven assumption that HIV attacks cells and causes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Has Sustiva Solved an HIV Mystery?</title>
		<link>http://www.semmelweis.org/2008/12/09/ssi-endorses-1984-science-report-retraction/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Has Sustiva Solved an HIV Mystery?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semmelweis.org/?p=206#comment-706</guid>
		<description>[...] HIV/AIDS research is based upon Dr. Gallo’s unproven assumption that HIV attacks cells and causes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HIV/AIDS research is based upon Dr. Gallo’s unproven assumption that HIV attacks cells and causes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SSI Award Recipient Files Defamation Suit at Semmelweis Society International</title>
		<link>http://www.semmelweis.org/2008/12/09/ssi-endorses-1984-science-report-retraction/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>SSI Award Recipient Files Defamation Suit at Semmelweis Society International</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 06:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semmelweis.org/?p=206#comment-367</guid>
		<description>[...] AIDS, Dr. Gallo scribbled over the report and published these in Science, (1, 2, 3, 4), completely circumventing the scientific peer review process. By the time Gallo’s scientific misconduct was confirmed in 1993, billions of tax dollars had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AIDS, Dr. Gallo scribbled over the report and published these in Science, (1, 2, 3, 4), completely circumventing the scientific peer review process. By the time Gallo’s scientific misconduct was confirmed in 1993, billions of tax dollars had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Investigative Reporter Files Suit</title>
		<link>http://www.semmelweis.org/2008/12/09/ssi-endorses-1984-science-report-retraction/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Investigative Reporter Files Suit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 05:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semmelweis.org/?p=206#comment-366</guid>
		<description>[...] AIDS, Dr. Gallo scribbled over the report and published these in Science, (1, 2, 3, 4), completely circumventing the scientific peer review process. By the time Gallo’s scientific misconduct was confirmed in 1993, billions of tax dollars had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AIDS, Dr. Gallo scribbled over the report and published these in Science, (1, 2, 3, 4), completely circumventing the scientific peer review process. By the time Gallo’s scientific misconduct was confirmed in 1993, billions of tax dollars had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will Wrigley&#8217;s Spearmint Cure AIDS?</title>
		<link>http://www.semmelweis.org/2008/12/09/ssi-endorses-1984-science-report-retraction/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will Wrigley&#8217;s Spearmint Cure AIDS?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 13:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semmelweis.org/?p=206#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] received fame and fortune for being the alleged co-discoverers of HIV. But while Gallo was later found guilty of scientific misconduct, Dr. Montagnier received the Nobel Prize – after his pharmaceutical employer gave $1 million to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] received fame and fortune for being the alleged co-discoverers of HIV. But while Gallo was later found guilty of scientific misconduct, Dr. Montagnier received the Nobel Prize – after his pharmaceutical employer gave $1 million to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
